← back to 〜ことは〜が

〜ことは〜が details

write + I do X, yes, but — the word itself is granted, and the objection follows

kaku kotoha kaku ga

I do X, yes, but — the word itself is granted, and the objection follows

meaning: do write, but

行くいくことは行くがことはいくが、あまりすすまない。

iku kotoha iku ga, amari ki wa susumanai.

I do go, but I'm not keen on it. neutral

おいしいことはおいしいけど、ちょっとたかいよね。

oishii koto wa oishii kedo, chotto takai yo ne.

It's tasty all right, but it is a bit pricey, isn't it. casual

  • dictionary form
  • た-form
  • i-adjective
  • na-adjective
  • colloquial
  • alternant

Examples

I do X, all right, but — the speaker grants the very predicate at issue before qualifying it

くことはくが、あまりすすまない。

ikukotohaikuga, amari ki wa susumanai.

I do go, but I'm not keen on it. neutral

おいしいことはおいしいけど、ちょっとたかいよね。

oishii koto wa oishii kedo, chotto takai yo ne.

It's tasty all right, but it is a bit pricey, isn't it. casual

説明せつめいくことはきましたが、正直しょうじきよくかりませんでした。

setsumei o kiku koto wa kikimashita ga, shoujiki yoku wakarimasen deshita.

I did listen to the explanation, but honestly I didn't really follow it. neutral

んだことはんだが、内容ないようはもうおぼえていない。

yonda koto wa yonda ga, naiyou wa mou oboete inai.

I did read it, but I no longer remember what was in it. neutral

このアプリは便利べんりなことは便利べんりだが、電池でんちりがはやい。

kono apuri wa benri na koto wa benri da ga, denchi no heri ga hayai.

This app is handy enough, but the battery drains fast. neutral

検討けんとうすることはいたしましたが、今回こんかい見送みおくらせていただきます。

kentou suru koto wa itashimashita ga, konkai wa miokurasete itadakimasu.

We did give it consideration, but on this occasion we will pass. formal

Formation

Variant notes

Notes

Both copies are the same word, and only the second inflects — politeness and
keigo included (くことはきました, 検討けんとうすることはいたしました).
Past alone may be echoed on both: んだことはんだが。

Related patterns

Similar

  • けど concedes a whole clause and moves on; ことは〜が narrows the concession to a single word by repeating it, so the listener knows exactly which part is being granted and which part the objection is about to attack.

  • The が here IS the contrastive が, with the concession built in front of it — plain 〜が opposes two different facts (やすいが、しつわるい), while ことは〜が first admits the very word the objection will qualify (やすいことはやすいが).

  • ものの is written register and concedes a fact that turned out not to matter; ことは〜が is spoken-first, repeats one word, and always sets up the speaker's own reservation about that same word.

Lookalikes

  • The た row walks straight into it — ったことは… sets up the experiential ったことがある, and only the repeated verb (ったことはった) tells the reader that a concession, not a life experience, is being reported.

  • Same 〜ことは opening, unrelated grammar — ことはない denies NECESSITY with one verb and stops there (あやまることはない), while ことは〜が repeats the verb and concedes it; reading only as far as ことは leaves the two indistinguishable.