← back to

details

write + it's that…

kaku no

it's that…; is it that…? — the plain-style explanatory ending

ちょっとあたまいたいの。

chotto atama ga itai no.

It's just that I have a bit of a headache. casual

どこくの?

doko iku no?

Where are you off to? casual

  • dictionary form
  • past
  • negative
  • negative + past
  • na-adjective
  • noun

Examples

explaining — the sentence accounts for something the listener can already see

ちょっとあたまいたいの。

chotto atama ga itai no.

It's just that I have a bit of a headache. casual

明日あしたから出張しゅっちょうなの。

ashita kara shutchou na no.

I'm away on a business trip from tomorrow, you see. casual

asking after it — the same tail with rising intonation

どこくの?

doko iku no?

Where are you off to? casual

もうべたの?

mou tabeta no?

You've eaten already? casual

Formation

Notes

Rising の asks, falling の explains — and falling の on a statement skews soft
and feminine, where men reach for 〜んだ and the question is gender-neutral.
Nouns and na-adjectives link with な in the non-past (学生がくせいなの); the
past keeps だった (学生がくせいだったの).

Related patterns

Similar

  • The same explanatory frame at two registers — の is the plain-style ending and stops there (どうしたの), んです carries it into です/ます speech (どうしたんですか); きますの survives only as dated, refined-feminine speech, so the polite version is んです and never a politer の.

  • Both close a spoken question, but か asks flatly for a fact and works in any register, while の asks after the situation behind what the speaker can see (いてるの?) and stays plain-style — か on a plain form is blunt where の is soft.

Lookalikes

  • The same kana doing opposite jobs — sentence-final の ends the clause (およぐの?), while the nominalizing の heads it into a following predicate (およぐのがき); if a predicate follows the の, it is not this pattern.

  • Same kana, different job — between two nouns の links them (わたしほん), at the end of a finished sentence it is the explanatory particle asking or accounting for something (どうしたの?), and no noun follows it there at all.

  • What follows decides — the nominalizer hands its clause to a particle and a predicate (およぐのがきだ), while sentence-final の closes the utterance and nothing but a final particle or intonation follows it (どうしたの・らないのよ).